[Serious attention]The “Sparobo” developer glared on the hazard of “one-sided thought proposals from followers” …

In my case, it may be mentioned to be a secondary creation
I’ve been concerned with Super Robo for a few years…

“List of participating works that I thought” and “Original robots and characters that I thought” are
That’s precisely what I’ve been receiving in writing for 30 years.

simply to them
“○○○ was implemented because I (individual) proposed it.”
“○○○ participated in the war thanks to my (individual) suggestion.”
There are some circumstances that might have had
at occasions up to now
“Even although the ○○○ I proposed was applied,
I did not hear from you.” “That’s my thought, is not it?”
I’ve been informed.

[PS4]Super Robot Wars 30
Bandai Namco Entertainment(2021-10-28T00:00:01Z)
4.1 out of 5 stars

[Switch]Super Robot Wars 30
Bandai Namco Entertainment(2021-10-28T00:00:01Z)
4.2 out of 5 stars

Reactions to this text

Because it is the timing of the 4th yr for the reason that arson incident
It’s a narrative that got here out. Because it is a matter of life and demise,
I’ve to reconfirm the hazard even when I do not put out a selected title.

It’s okay to say, “Thanks to me, XX was implemented.”
Only the one that paid the copyright payment.

I do not thoughts in case you ship me your concepts, however
I do not perceive why there isn’t any such factor as courtesy.
It’s too impudent to thanks for sending it despite the fact that you did not even ask for it.

There was an everyday “My Super Robo” thread.

There appears to be lots of bother, particularly with Super Robo


Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *