■ From AI illustrator Yumasu’s Twitter
NowadaysAn illustrator working with hand-drawn + AI.
DM for work requests, and many others.〜Progress report of guide challenge〜
To a sure extent, the design template has progressed! !
The cowl and different particulars are roughly short-term, and I’m nonetheless fascinated about refining them, however I’ve been capable of see the data I would like from the individuals who utilized.#AI illustrator book project pic.twitter.com/e0bs5sgHgt— Yumasu @ Book planning in progress (@U__masu) January 2, 2023
going to high school#AI art #AI illustration #AI painting brush #anythingv3 pic.twitter.com/b3XDfVAJTv
— Yumasu @ Book planning in progress (@U__masu) December 26, 2022
↓But…
■ From Twitter
You know what… pic.twitter.com/nz1kiW2Kmv
— Always sleepy 🛌 (@mikan_spi) January 8, 2023
Image of i2i suspicion (authentic picture on the left) pic.twitter.com/uepmOW6icv
— Always sleepy 🛌 (@mikan_spi) January 8, 2023
* “i2i” A way during which AI generates a brand new illustration from the unique illustration
In different phrases, it isn’t the unique of AI, however the suspicion of an illustration made by letting AI copy another person’s illustration
↓As for this…
@U__masu
In response to the suspicion of i2i technology Trepac utilizing your copyrighted work, we request the next.1) Explanation for illustrations strongly suspected of i2i technology utilizing copyrighted works of others
2) Disclosure of all generated info together with prompts and seed values of suspected work and verification of reproducibility
3) Complete suspension of guide growth till suspicion is dispelled https://t.co/TI7fh5FGIK
— Rin Amatsukarin (@Amatsukarin) January 8, 2023
It just isn’t generated in such a method that different pictures are labored on and used as they’re.
However, I’m sorry that the composition was related and made me really feel distrustful.
Proof of reproducibility is tough because of causes comparable to utilizing illustrations drawn by your self as knowledge and retouching.— Yumasu @ Book planning in progress (@U__masu) January 9, 2023
What’s that? w
No drawback? w
Exposing despite the fact that you have not carried out something mistaken is an issue of your lack of ethics lol
Something I used to be afraid of occurred…
This is horrible… You put up an image of a god that the artist labored so arduous to attract, as if to say that you just drew and generated the prototype your self…
Isn’t it authorized to have the AI learn the image and output it? w ^^
After all, AI portray is crap
Ai illustration
The drawback has turn into an increasing number of critical.
It’s unhappy that the AI is healthier
Just in search of matching factors has turn into inadequate as a trepak judgment
If you want easy footage, I favor the one on the best.
That being stated, even when everybody gathers and complains about it, if it is actually an outdated matter, it’ll disappear in the end because of the copyright regulation.
I believe the one that drew it on the left is wonderful, however on the best it isn’t that particular person, it is simply the AI that is wonderful w The particular person on the best thinks he is wonderful w
Thank you on your arduous work.
People on the AI aspect are sending out misunderstandings that there isn’t a drawback if it isn’t i2i, so I’ll write it in the meanwhile.
The present AI has already discovered illustrations from the educational supply with out permission, so i2i or t2i is used with out permission, so I would like individuals who do not know to know.
Seriously… How does an AI painter who talks about studying innocence make excuses for this?
Did you suppose this was not recognized? It’s wonderful that you do not know the world.
End of Ethics within the AI Neighborhood
If it isn’t i2i, there are numerous AI necrosis which might be attempting to carry it to the speculation that there isn’t a drawback, so let’s watch out to not substitute the issue.
The present AI itself makes use of footage stolen from artists, so it is the identical whether or not it is i2i or t2i.
AI painters are beginning to criticize this case, and that is factor, but it surely’s on the similar stage when utilizing picture technology AI that does not even return earnings after studying with out permission, and places the artist’s title within the immediate and outputs it. Is it secure? The ethics are on the identical stage, with the distinction between judicial precedents and whether or not or not there may be laws. that.
There is usually a joke that claims, “I’m not good at drawing, so I want to eat the skill of a god painter.”
The time has come to eat significantly (with AI)
Wow… lastly this sort of case got here out… i2i arbitrarily ripped off folks’s illustrations
That’s why he referred to as himself an AI illustrator… and even tried to make a guide… This business is harmful.
But in the case of this, is t2i (AI that generates footage from characters) secure?
I’ll come again to the dialogue… Either method, the AI is studying different folks’s drawings by itself…
 |
AI × illustration evaluation guide which you could perceive roughly with this one guide
Release date: 2022-10-08 |
 |
AI-illustrated Law Textbooks Taught by Lawyers (Nagasaki International Law Office)
Release date: 2022-11-08 |
